Ah bon?! Mais comment etes-vous parvenu a avoir une opinion sur ses theories si vous ne les avez meme pas lues?! Est-ce vraiment coment les "historiens" travaillent? Cela n'aurait rien d'etonnant au fond...

J'avais lu cela il y a quelque temps : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Chrono ... o-Nosovsky)#Criticism
et quelques uns des liens indiqués. C'est largement suffisant.

[
Un historien travaille a la base avec les sources premieres, et non secondaires, et ne se satisfait pas d'un vulgaire article redige par les rigolos de wikipedia. Je ne m'interesse pas a ce que wiki "pense", mais ce que VOUS pensez apres avoir lu l'oeuvre de Fomenko.

Description
This is the most explosive tractate on history and chronology ever written. This book is not another conspiracy theory - every hypothesis it contains is backed by solid scientific data. The book is well-illustrated, contains 446 graphs and illustrations, copies of ancient manuscripts, and countless facts attesting to the falsity of the chronology used nowadays. You will be amazed to discover: That the chronology universally taken for granted is indeed wrong; That this chronology was essentially invented in the XVI-XVII century; That archaeological, dendrochronological, paleographical and carbon methods of dating of ancient sources and artefacts known today are erroneous or non-exact; That there is not a single document that could be reliably dated earlier than the XIth century; That Ancient Rome, Greece and Egypt were crafted during the Renaissance by humanists and clergy; That Jesus Christ may have been born in 1053 and crucified in 1086 AD; That the Old Testament is probably a rendition of Middle Ages events; That the Old Europe is not as ancient as it claims. --Bookmasters Review, OH, 06/2005

Présentation de l'éditeur
Asserts that most of 'World History' is a fiction! Learn how and why Ancient Rome, Greece and Egypt were invented and crafted during Renaissance. Discover the Old Testament as a veiled rendition of events of Middle Ages written centuries after the New Testament. Perceive the Crusaders as contemporaries of The Crucifixion punishing the tormentors of the Messiah. What if Jesus Christ was born in 1153 and crucified in 1186 AD? Sounds unbelievable! Not after you've read this book by Anatoly Fomenko, a leading mathematician of our time. He follows in the steps of Sir Isaac Newton, finds clear evidence of falsification of History by medieval clergy and humanists. Armed with computers, astronomy and statistics he proves the history of humankind to be both dramatically different and drastically shorter than generally presumed. Archaeological, dendrochronological, paleographical and carbon methods of dating of ancient sources and artifacts are both non-exact and contradictory, therefore there is not a single piece of firm written evidence or artifact that could be reliably and independently dated earlier than the eleventh century. The consensual chronology we live with was essentially crafted in the sixteenth century from the contradictory mix of innumerable copies of ancient Latin and Greek manuscripts (all originals have mysteriously disappeared) and the 'proofs' delivered by the late mediaeval astronomers, cemented by the authority of writings of the Church Fathers

tout bien considéré, je me demande si je ne suis pas moi-même un produit du complot ...

Alors là, je m'inscris en faux, parce que, précisément, mon inscription sur ce forum date d'avant ma création : na !

JE LE SAVAIS ! (mais j'espérais encore, bêtement)



Mais au fait, dites-moi, Huyustus : vous non plus vous n'existez pas; finalement, vous êtes un produit de mon imaginaire dépravé ?

Je sens que je ne vais pas tarder à vous traiter de concept ...